The jury for Second Year Design projects took place on 14th March 2020 at PVPCOA. The jury was presided by Ar. Madhav Joshi and Ar. Dwaipayan Chakravarty.
The Small Scale cooperative project and Education + Learning Centre were the two proposed projects that were conceived by the students on their Relative Study Program at Lachung, North Sikkim. Three solutions for each of the projects were pinned up for jury’s critical inputs. The emphasis of design was to respond to the context of climate, terrain, and the idea of community of Lachung.
The issues that the jury cited were pertaining to sensitive handling of sloping terrain, the existing water body and its repercussion in space making act, the appropriateness of form, consideration of sun path, wind direction and technique of construction. The jury also probed the students to think deeper and critical regarding the notions that are carried - such as what constitutes ugliness, how does one appreciate a form, how does one get inspired, what is the meaning of the community, why should one carry the fascination of a ‘view’ and ideas of multifunctional spaces. Tracings were also sketched impromptu to analyze patterns of movement and zoning.
The jury also shared their personal experiences about importance of sketching and literature as possible mediums for observing, analyzing, and conceiving ideas of spaces.
The session ended with a note of thanks conveyed by faculty members and presenting a sketch book and students’ magazine to the jury members.
The Small Scale cooperative project and Education + Learning Centre were the two proposed projects that were conceived by the students on their Relative Study Program at Lachung, North Sikkim. Three solutions for each of the projects were pinned up for jury’s critical inputs. The emphasis of design was to respond to the context of climate, terrain, and the idea of community of Lachung.
The issues that the jury cited were pertaining to sensitive handling of sloping terrain, the existing water body and its repercussion in space making act, the appropriateness of form, consideration of sun path, wind direction and technique of construction. The jury also probed the students to think deeper and critical regarding the notions that are carried - such as what constitutes ugliness, how does one appreciate a form, how does one get inspired, what is the meaning of the community, why should one carry the fascination of a ‘view’ and ideas of multifunctional spaces. Tracings were also sketched impromptu to analyze patterns of movement and zoning.
The jury also shared their personal experiences about importance of sketching and literature as possible mediums for observing, analyzing, and conceiving ideas of spaces.
The session ended with a note of thanks conveyed by faculty members and presenting a sketch book and students’ magazine to the jury members.
jury consultant- Best Evidence has been the jury consulting firm of choice for an elite group of leading financial institutions, insurers, professional service firms, media and technology companies, law firms, healthcare concerns, and other successful business enterprises and high-net-worth individuals. We are called upon to play a trusted role in high-stakes and high-profile cases, including bet-the-company litigation and other matters with fundamental consequences for our clients.
ReplyDeleteThank you so much providing amazing information.architects in pune
ReplyDeleteInformative stuff. Nice share.
ReplyDeleteInterior Designers in Pollachi
Interior Decorators in Madurai
Interior designers in Pollachi
It looks like it was a good event, every architecture school should have contests like this.
ReplyDelete_____________________
I install fiberglass panels